THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING

Course objectives

This course introduces the basic principles of aviation safety, standards and regulations. It is divided in two parts. ICAO standards and civil aviation regulations (3 CFU, SSD ING-IND/35) The first part covers the following topics. Introduction to safety objectives and description the regulatory means to reach and maintain this level of safety. The main principles of the Chicago Convention, including the ICAO standards and recommended practices. Structure of the main technical regulations their hierarchy and applicability. The main applicable requirements for designing and manufacturing a product. EASA scope of competencies and the EU/EASA regulatory structure (basic regulation, Parts, CS, AMC/GM) for airworthiness and associated domains. Explanation on how users comply with the operational rules, operators’ responsibilities and state the main regulatory principles on aircraft maintenance. Learning objectives After completing this course, the student will be able to: - state the air transport safety objectives, explain how these objectives are implemented at the international level and explain the responsibilities of the different contracting states - describe the main international and European regulatory bodies’ activities and state the contents of the Chicago Convention - explain how the main technical regulations are structured, describe their hierarchy and applicability and describe their structure - explain the airworthiness certificates specificities and describe TC holders’ responsibilities - state the main Part 21 procedures - explain how users comply with the operational rules, describe operators’ responsibilities and - state the main regulatory principles on aircraft maintenance - State the ATM/ANS safety regulations, describe their overall content, describe their links and explain how some European countries have taken these regulations into account Aviation safety management (3CFU) (3 CFU, SSD ING-IND/17) According to the principles of ICAO Safety Management System (SMS), the second part of the course introduces general concepts of aviation risk and safety management, as well as definitions of hazards, incidents, accidents, and associated models. An overview of traditional models for risk and safety management: Heinrich model, Swiss Cheese Model, and Normal Accident Theory. Recent trends in aviation safety management: complexity theory, Safety-I vs. Safety-II and Resilience management and engineering. Different vision on human error and the role of human factor in complex socio-technical systems;. Safety Management System: structure and implementation. Just culture, safety reporting, definition and usage of taxonomies. Foundations of accident investigation. Learning objectives After completing this course, the student will be able to: - understand and describe safety processes and events properly using terminology in line with the ICAO SMS - interpret safety processes and events applying traditional models for aviation and safety management - differentiate safety processes and events (depending on their complexity level) in order to apply advanced models and methods - identify the role of human factor in safety processes and events according to different definitions of human error - understand the different features of a SMS in relation to safety reporting and taxonomies - develop a preliminary risk assessment for safety processes and events in a reactive and proactive perspective - develop systemic analyses for complex aviation infrastructures and larger socio-technical systems - possibly extend the acquired theoretical competences to other critical infrastructures having a complex socio-technical dimension (other transportation means, telecommunications systems, smart cities)

Channel 1
RICCARDO PATRIARCA Lecturers' profile

Program - Frequency - Exams

Course program
Fundamentals of risk and safety management; ICAO Safety Management System; Traditional accident causation models (Heinrich, Reason); Definitions of human error and analysis; HFACS taxonomy, ADREP taxonomy; Safety reporting; Systemic event analysis; Resilience engineering; STAMP and CAST.
Prerequisites
Basic knowledge of flight mechanics, aviation systems, probability and statistics
Books
Slides and booklet provided by the professor. Please visit the professor's website, and the Teams group linked to the course.
Teaching mode
Frontal lessons for the achievement of the knowledge objectives, case studies and exercises, by students, for the achievement of other specific objectives. In case of restrictions due to the pandemic, lectures will be held digitally using Microsoft Teams, according to faculty recommendations in digital or blended mode.
Frequency
Not mandatory, ma highly recommended.
Exam mode
Presentation and discussion of a group project related to the course topics. Oral discussion to assess comprehension of the theoretical aspects of the program, as well as correctness, precision, and the ability to delve into the resolution of the proposed exercises. The evaluation on a scale of thirty points will be distributed as follows: minimal knowledge of the proposed topics (assessment between 18 and 20); average knowledge of the proposed topics (21-23); ability to apply knowledge sufficiently to an operational problem (24-25); good ability to apply knowledge in solving complex problems (27-28); excellent ability to apply knowledge with good communication skills and critical thinking (29-30 with honors).
Bibliography
Dekker, S. and S. Pruchnicki. 2014. “Drifting into Failure: Theorising the Dynamics of Disaster Incubation.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science15(6).E Heinrich, H. W. 1931. Industrial Accident Prevention: A Scientific Approach. McGraw-Hill Inc. Hollnagel, E. 2014. Safety-I and Safety-II (The Past and Future ofSafety Management). Farnham, UK: Ashgate. Hollnagel, E., D. D. Woods, and Nancy Leveson. 2006. Resilience Engineering -Concepts and Precepts. Ashgate Publishing Ltd. Leveson, N. 2019. CAST Handbook: How to Learn More from Incidents and Accidents. Leveson, N. G. 2002. System Safety Engineering: Back to the Future. Boston, MA: MIT. Reason, J. 2000. “Human Error: Models and Management.” BMJ: British Medical Journal 320(7237):768–70. Shappell, S. A. and D. A. Wiegmann. 2000. The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System HFACS. Washington, DC (US).
Lesson mode
Classroom lectures will be used to achieve the primary learning objectives, while case studies and exercises will target specific goals. The course’s Microsoft Teams space will host material uploads, additional resources, and all communications.
  • Academic year2025/2026
  • CourseAeronautical engineering
  • CurriculumGestione ed operazioni nell'aviazione civile e sistemi di volo
  • Year2nd year
  • Semester1st semester
  • SSDING-IND/17
  • CFU3