Educational objectives The general purpose of the module is to provide an in-depth knowledge
of the theoretical and methodological issues related to the study of
language acquisition in its various components, discussing the
theoretical models, and analyzing the main stages of both typical and
atypical development, in the perspective of the course of life. Risk
factors for possible developmental delays will also be considered as
well as aspects relating to diagnosis, with presentation of tools to
assess language development for the identification of language delays
and disorders, and proposals for intervention programs. Finally, the
relationship between language development and other aspects of human
cognition will be discussed, with reference to executive functions.
The module is divided into three parts. In the first part, the main
theoretical approaches to language development will be explored,
comparing them based on the arguments proposed in relation to three
themes: nature and origin of language, structure and functioning of
the linguistic system, mechanisms of language acquisition. The second
part will discuss the phases of typical language development
(pre-grammatical complexity, grammaticalization of utterances,
development of recursion, reorganization based on the discourse),
illustrating the risk factors for delays and / or impairments in the
linguistic area, and the profiles of atypical development. In the
third part of the course, a laboratory activity will be implemented
which will be defined at the beginning of the course.
At the end of the course, the student will have acquired
theoretical-practical knowledge that will allow to analyze the
infantile spontaneous language, distinguish the levels of linguistic
development of a child, identify the suitable tools to evaluate
aspects of strength and weakness, based on the theoretical reference,
elaborate its development profile, and recognize any risk and / or
pathological indices to define a diagnosis.
|
Educational objectives General aims
The course provides theoretical and applicative contents related to:
biological bases of social development
Theories of social development
(10 hours)
attachment relationships
peer relationships
empaty,prosocial and moral reasoning
emotions regulation and effortfull control
gender identity and segregation
identity processes in adolescence
Vulnerabillty and health risk behaviors in adolescence
(30 hours)
The course is based on lectures, encouraging active student participation. There will be exercises in small groups aimed at the application of evaluation tools of socio-emotional development and quality of interpersonal relationships into classrooms.
((8 hours)
Students who have attendance problems will still have to carry out a practical activity by e-learning.
Attendance to the lessons is considered not mandatory.
Specific aims. Knowledge and understanding: passing the exam would imply being capable of knowing and understanding social development, determinants and correlates across different ages
Applying knowledge and understanding: passing the exam would imply mastering appropriate tools to identify typical and atypical social/emotional profiles
Making judgment: passing the exam would imply mastering the ability to make informed judgments and evaluations on determinants and correlates of typical and atypical social/emotional profiles. Communication skills: passing the exam would attest that students master the communication abilities and tools needed for an efficacious scientific communication. Learning skills: passing the exam would attest the acquisition of skills conducive to further learning related to psychological test and programs in the field of social and emotional development. During the traditional lessons such abilities would be transmitted by emphasizing different perspective
|
Educational objectives General aims
This course aims to promote students’ theoretical and practical competences to get knowledge of the main theoretical models in the study of temperament and personality-related characteristics across the life-span, with particular attention to the role of individual differences in those interventions which goal is promoting well-being and preventing maladjustment across the life-span.
Expected learning goals are: competences in critical comprehension of theoretical models in Psychology of temperament and personality across the life-span, competences in the identification and analysis of in-dividual differences in temperament and personality across the life-span, competences in preparation and management of universal intervention promoting well-being and preventing maladjustment.
Frontal lessons will promote students’ knowledge of basic principles that guide them in identifying indica-tors connected with individual differences’ examination aimed to promote well-being and prevent malad-justment across the life-span. In addition, students will have the opportunity to examine in depth recent studies about temperamental factors and personality development, as well as about the most effective universal evidence-based interventions.
Specific aims. Knowledge and comprehension: passing the exam guarantee to be able to comprehend and to handle scientific tools to evaluate temperament and personality dimensions, as well as evidence-based intervention programs. Skills to apply knowledge and comprehension: passing the exam guarantee to be able to identify the indicators to evaluate personality across the life-span, and to be able to plan intervention programs directed to children, adolescents, and adults. Independent judgment: passing the exam imply getting the capacity to critically evaluate theoretical models and evaluation tools, being able to recognize correspondent advantages and disadvantages. In addition, passing the exam promotes capabilities related to planning promotion and prevention intervention programs. Those skills are acquired during the lessons through students’ exposure to scientific reports and case-studies on personality profiles during frontal lessons and during in-class group activities. Communicative skills: passing the exams imply the capacity to effectively use communicative tools to present profiles and scientific reports focusing on temperament and personality factors. Learning skills: passing the exam imply acquisition of transverse learning skills that will allow students to examine theoretical and practical models, and related intervention programs, in depth across the course of their professional and academic career. Such learning skills are acquired during this course, with particular emphasis – especially during frontal lessons – to the discussion on theoretical models and profile analysis, and the presentation of alternative methods to prepare and to write promotion and prevention intervention programs.
|
Educational objectives Knowledge and understanding:
The course will provide students with a solid knowledge base on the fundamental and historical principles
of neuropsychology, i.e., the study of the cognitive effects of brain injury to understand the functional
structure of the mind, as well as its specific diagnostic and rehabilitation purposes. Students will learn in-
depth about the main cognitive and emotional-motivational deficits caused by brain injuries or
dysfunctions, including their clinical features, diagnostic modalities and the main interpretative models
adopted. In addition, they will have the opportunity to learn about research methodologies and assessment
and intervention tools.
Applied knowledge and understanding
Students will acquire the necessary skills to extrapolate relevant information from anamnestic information
and observation of the behaviour of patients with cognitive disorders caused by brain injury. They will also
be able to describe and interpret patient behaviour using appropriate specialist terminology, identify
proper diagnostic tools and write brief neuropsychological assessment reports.
Autonomy of judgement
Students will learn how to judge patient behaviour and make diagnostic choices based on limited
information. They will be able to justify their decisions and discuss their limitations critically.
Communication skills
Students should be able to clearly and specifically summarise the results of behavioural observations and
diagnostic tools. Furthermore, they will be able to communicate the results of an evaluation in oral and
written form, adapting the communication to the interlocutor's knowledge and the evaluation process's
aims.
Learning skills
Students will develop instrumental and research skills to acquire further knowledge in neuropsychology.
They can use targeted literature searches to further the topics covered in the classroom.
|
Educational objectives The course aims to provide knowledge on the key points of research methodology, research designs,
and measurement-related issues, to deepen understanding of the use and interpretation of basic
statistics indices, and additionally, to provide knowledge on the use, setup, and interpretation of
major multivariate analysis techniques. These objectives will be achieved through lectures and
practical laboratory activities, structured as follows.
In the first part of the course, thematic cores related to research methodology will be discussed
(types of research, research validity; research designs for validity; reliability and validity of
measurements, research designs on groups and single cases).
In the second part of the course, concepts of descriptive statistics and techniques for univariate and
bivariate data analysis will be revisited (variables and levels of measurement, measures of central
tendency and variability, use of z-scores and percentiles, percentage calculation, contingency tables,
correlation and simple regression), with examples of their use in clinical practice and research.
The third part of the course will address non-parametric tests and the main multivariate statistical
techniques (univariate analysis of variance, statistical interaction tests, multiple regression).
Each described topic includes a practical exercise to be carried out in the classroom during
laboratory hours, using material provided by the teacher, presenting statistical or methodological
problems and asking students to perform one or more of the following activities: define the
variables involved and specify their characteristics, define the experimental design, identify any
confounding variables and explain how to control them, calculate statistical indices, test hypotheses,
and comment on the results. Each exercise is followed by the teacher's presentation of the correct
procedures for solving the proposed problems and a discussion of the errors made by the students.
1.Knowledge and understanding. Passing the exam would imply being capable of understanding
and using the most widely used methodological tools for data analyses in basic and applied research
in psychology and psychopathology; passing the ex-am would also imply the ability to elaborate
autonomously on research issues.
2.Applying knowledge and understanding. Passing the exam would imply mastering the research
techniques generally applied in the research contexts tapped by the Degree Course, to which this
specific course belongs. Students would also master how to apply the technical tools acquired to
various contexts, as other psychology domains, social science contexts, and health-related research
contexts.
3.Making judgements. Passing the exam would imply mastering the ability to make informed
judgments and evaluations on research projects, research designs, and methodological issues in data
analyses; such abilities would allow to detect pitfalls, limitations, and potential improvements and
developments in the research endeavors pertaining to psychological, social and health-related
processes. These abilities would be attained through discussions on complex research issues, and
complex analytical results. Discussions would be held in the traditional lessons as well as during the
laboratory sessions.
4.Communication skills. Passing the exam would attest that students master the communication
abilities and tools needed for an efficacious scientific communication. These abilities would be
attained during the traditional lessons and the laboratory sessions by emphasizing and instantiating
the use of scientific terminology and technically-oriented rhetoric.
5.Learning skills. Passing the exam would attest the acquisition of skills conducive to further
learning on the general topic of scientific methodology; such abilities would allow students to tackle
new complex issues during their academic and professional lives, in the domains of research
designing, and data analyzing. During the traditional les-sons such abilities would be transmitted by
emphasizing different perspective on data analysis and research planning, and showing – during the
laboratory session – alternative and complementary approaches to research questions, which can be
applicable to new and different contexts and domains.
|