Course program
This course is articulated in two modules, it aims to introduce the most relevant theoretical models in the study of personality and temperament and different intervention models of psychological rehabilitation that take into account the role of individual differences to promote individual well-being and prevent maladjust-ment. Particular attention will be devoted also to intervention methods.
The first module focuses on the topic of individual differences according to the theory of personality traits and socio-cognitive theory (frontal lessons/flipped lessons). In addition, it focuses on the examination in depth of the evaluation of personality traits and of self-efficacy beliefs, as well as of those indicators associated with individual differences in promoting well-being and preventing maladjustment across the life-span.
The second module focuses on the topic of temperamental individual differences (frontal lessons/flipped les-sons) and it focuses on the examination in depth of the evaluation of temperamental traits and of the most re-cent studies on temperamental basis.
Prerequisites
This course implies discrete knowledge of theoretical basis of personality psychology, and discrete knowledge of written English. For those students who did not have Personality Psychology in their back-ground during Bachelor degree, it is useful to integrate their knowledge in such direction.
Books
- Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 57, 401-421.
- Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological bulletin, 132(1), 1.
- Caspi, A., Roberts, B.W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 56, 453-484.
- Vecchione, M., Alessandri, G., Barbaranelli, C., & Caprara, G. (2012). Gender differences in the Big Five personality development: A longitudinal investigation from late adolescence to emerging adulthood. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(6), 740-746.
- Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Eggum, N. D. (2010). Emotion-related self-regulation and its rela-tion to children's maladjustment. Annual review of clinical psychology, 6, 495-525.
- Rothbart, M. K., & Bates, J. E. (2006). Temperament. In W. Damon (Editor-in-Chief ) & N. Eisen-berg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, personality deve-lopment(pp. 99–166). New York: Wiley.
- Evans, D. E., & Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Developing a model for adult temperament. Journal of Re-search in Personality, 41(4), 868- 888.
- Thartori, E., Zuffianò, A., Pastorelli, C., Di Giunta, L., Lunetti, C., Lansford, J. E., ... & Caprara, G. V. (2018). The interactive effects of maternal personality and adolescent temperament on externali-zing behavior problem trajectories from age 12 to 14. Personality and Individual Differences, 134, 301-307.
- Caprara, G. V., Fida, R., Vecchione, M., Del Bove, G., Vecchio, G. M., Barbaranelli, C., & Bandu-ra, A. (2008). Longitudinal analysis of the role of perceived self-efficacy for self-regulated learning in academic continuance and achievement. Journal of educational psychology, 100(3), 525
- Di Giunta, L., Iselin, A.-M. R., Lansford, J. E., Eisenberg, N., Lunetti, C., Thartori, E., Basili, E., Pastorel-li, C., Bacchini, D., Uribe Tirado, L. M., & Gerbino, M. (2018). Parents' and early adolescents’ self-efficacy about anger regulation and early adolescents’ internalizing and externalizing problems: A longitu-dinal study in three countries. Journal of Adolescence.
- Duell, N., Steinberg, L., Chein, J., Al-Hassan, S. M., Bacchini, D., Lei, C., ... & Lansford, J. E. (2016). Interaction of reward seeking and self-regulation in the prediction of risk taking: A cross-national test of the dual systems model. Developmental psychology, 52(10), 1593
- Iaria, G., Committeri, G., Pastorelli, C., Pizzamiglio, L., Watkins, K. E., & Carota, A. (2008). Neural activity of the anterior insula in emotional processing depends on the individuals' emotional susceptibility. Human brain mapping, 29(3), 363-373.
- Shulman, E. P., Smith, A. R., Silva, K., Icenogle, G., Duell, N., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2016). The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation. Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 17, 103-11
- Tackett, J. L. (2006). Evaluating models of the personality–psychopathology relationship in children and adolescents. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(5), 584-599.
- Lunetti, C., Iselin, A. M. R., Di Giunta, L., Lansford, J. E., Eisenberg, N., Pastorelli, C., ... & Rothenberg, W. A. (2021). Development of internalizing symptoms during adolescence in three countries: the
role of temperament and parenting behaviors. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 1-11.
Frequency
Attendance is stronlgy recommended
Exam mode
The topics of the course will be presented through frontal lessons, group presentations, flipped lessons, and in-class assignments. Frontal lessons aim to promote students’ knowledge and comprehension of theoretical models and methods associated with the study of individual differences in personality and temperament across the life-span, and to promote students’ skills in critically evaluating alternative prevention and promotion interventions, being able to recognize correspondent advantages and disadvantages. Group activities and in-class assignments aim: 1) to develop capacity to read and interpret scientific questionnaires to evaluate temperament and personality; 2) to acquire capacities to plan and implement evidence-based intervention programs, through practical activities in which students will have to produce project proposals. Group activities promote active participation of all students in the learning process through multiple specific activities aimed to facilitate the acquisition of the skills related to the learning goals of this course; 3) develop the critical capacity in the choice of the tools to be administered for the evaluation of the personality in the different contexts of health, labor, and legal law, knowing the advantages and disadvantages of using these tools in the process assessment; 4) acquire, through the study of the individual case, the ability to read and interpret the personality profile by integrating the information deriving from the various evaluation tools adopted, in order to advance more accurate hypotheses regarding the functioning of the person in his context.
All information about this course will be reported on the correspondent site on e-learning.
https://elearning2.uniroma1.it/login/index.php
Lesson mode
EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR THOSE STUDENTS WHO WILL ATTEND THE COURSE
1) First test:
- 8 multiple-choice questions (0-8 scores)
Each multiple-choice question has four alternative answers, only one is correct. Each correct answer is scored, uncorrect answers are scored 0.
This test will take place about at the sixth week of classes.
Those questions evaluate students' acquisition of knowledged through the materials to be studies for this course. This test will last 15 minutes and it will be in the written form.
- - open-ended question and a personality/temperament profile to be commented (0-4 scores). Evalua-tion for the open-ended question: below the average (0), on average (1), good (2), very good (3), ex-cellent (4). This test will last 1 hour overall (30 minutes per open-ended question) and it will be in the written form.
2) Second test: group presentation about a scientific article in English (0-4 scores). 0-1 score will be related to the formal aspects in the presentation (i.e., based on the organization of the information being presented); 0-2 scores will be related to the elaboration of the content of the presentation; 0-1 score will be related to the creativity of the presentation and the active involvement of the audience.
The goal of this activity is to evaluate: 1) students’ capacities to read and critically evalu-ate theoretical models and results of a scientific study; 2) students’ capacities to effectively and professionally talk about the results of a scientific research; 3) students’ transverse capacities to work in group.
Those presentation will take place orally once per week every week. Each presentation will last 45 minutes.
3) Third test: group presentation about a review committee to critically open a debate about one of the group presentation on a scientific article taken care by another group of students (0-2 scores)
0-1 score will be related to the formal aspects in the presentation (i.e., based on the organization of the in-formation being presented); 0-1 scores will be related to the elaboration of the content of the presentation.
Those presentation will take place orally once per week every week. Each presentation will last 15 minutes.
4) Fourth test: two questions right after each weekly group presentation about the scientific article (0-2 scores). This test will last 5 minutes and it will be in the written form.
5) Fifth test:
- 7 multiple-choice questions (0-7 scores)
Each multiple-choice question has four alternative answers, only one is correct. Each correct answer is scored, uncorrect answers are scored 0.
This test will take place at the last day of classes.
Those questions evaluate students' acquisition of knowledged through the materials to be studies for this course. This test will last 15 minutes and it will be in the written form.
- An open-ended question and a profile to be commented taking into account both personality and behavioral indicators (0-4 scores). Evaluation for the open-ended question: below the average (0), on average (1), good (2), very good (3), excellent (4). This test will last 1 hour overall (30 minutes per open-ended question) and it will be in the written form.
Total evaluation score for those students who will attend the course: 31 scores
***
EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR THOSE STUDENTS WHO WILL NOT ATTEND THE COURSE
- 23 multiple-choice questions about the topics reported on a syllabus in e-learning
These questions aim to assess the acquisition of knowledge acquired through independent study of the text-book and the scientific articles indicated in the program.
Each multiple-choice question has four alternative answers, only one is correct. Each correct answer is scored, uncorrect answers are scored 0.
This test will take place at the official day of exam reported on Infostud.
This test will last 30 minutes and it will be in the written form.
- 2 open-ended questions (each will be evaluated with 0-4 scores). In particular, one of those ques-tions will require to comment a profile with both personality and behavioral indicators.
Evaluation for the open-ended questions: below the average (0), on average (1), good (2), very good (3), excellent (4).
This test will last 1 hour overall (30 minutes per open-ended question) and it will be in the written form.
Total evaluation score for those students who will attend the course: 31 scores