Course program
Teaching content
This course is articulated in two modules, it aims to introduce the most relevant theoretical models in the study of personality and temperament and different intervention models of psychological rehabilitation that take into account the role of individual differences to promote individual well-being and prevent maladjust-ment. Particular attention will be devoted also to intervention methods.
The first module focuses on the topic of individual differences according to the theory of personality traits and socio-cognitive theory (frontal lessons/flipped lessons). In addition, it focuses on the examination in depth of the evaluation of personality traits and of self-efficacy beliefs, as well as of those indicators associated with individual differences in promoting well-being and preventing maladjustment across the life-span.
The second module focuses on the topic of temperamental individual differences (frontal lessons/flipped les-sons) and it focuses on the examination in depth of the evaluation of temperamental traits and of the most re-cent studies on temperamental basis.
Prerequisites
This course implies discrete knowledge of theoretical basis of personality psychology, and discrete knowledge of written English. For those students who did not have Personality Psychology in their back-ground during Bachelor degree, it is useful to integrate their knowledge in such direction.
Books
Una selezioni di articoli disponibili su e-learning:
- Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. An-nu. Rev. Psychol., 57, 401-421.
- Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in persona-lity traits across the life course: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological bulletin, 132(1), 1.
- Caspi, A., Roberts, B.W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 56, 453-484.
- Vecchione, M., Alessandri, G., Barbaranelli, C., & Caprara, G. (2012). Gender differences in the Big Five personality development: A longitudinal investigation from late adolescence to emerging adul-thood. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(6), 740-746.
- Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Eggum, N. D. (2010). Emotion-related self-regulation and its rela-tion to children's maladjustment. Annual review of clinical psychology, 6, 495-525.
- Rothbart, M. K., & Bates, J. E. (2006). Temperament. In W. Damon (Editor-in-Chief ) & N. Eisen-berg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, personality deve-lopment(pp. 99–166). New York: Wiley.
- Evans, D. E., & Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Developing a model for adult temperament. Journal of Re-search in Personality, 41(4), 868- 888.
- Thartori, E., Zuffianò, A., Pastorelli, C., Di Giunta, L., Lunetti, C., Lansford, J. E., ... & Caprara, G. V. (2018). The interactive effects of maternal personality and adolescent temperament on externali-zing behavior problem trajectories from age 12 to 14. Personality and Individual Differences, 134, 301-307.
- Caprara, G. V., Fida, R., Vecchione, M., Del Bove, G., Vecchio, G. M., Barbaranelli, C., & Bandu-ra, A. (2008). Longitudinal analysis of the role of perceived self-efficacy for self-regulated learning in academic continuance and achievement. Journal of educational psychology, 100(3), 525
- Di Giunta, L., Iselin, A.-M. R., Lansford, J. E., Eisenberg, N., Lunetti, C., Thartori, E., Basili, E., Pastorel-li, C., Bacchini, D., Uribe Tirado, L. M., & Gerbino, M. (2018). Parents' and early adolescents’ self-efficacy about anger regulation and early adolescents’ internalizing and externalizing problems: A longitu-dinal study in three countries. Journal of Adolescence.
- Duell, N., Steinberg, L., Chein, J., Al-Hassan, S. M., Bacchini, D., Lei, C., ... & Lansford, J. E. (2016). Interaction of reward seeking and self-regulation in the prediction of risk taking: A cross-national test of the dual systems model. Developmental psychology, 52(10), 1593
- Iaria, G., Committeri, G., Pastorelli, C., Pizzamiglio, L., Watkins, K. E., & Carota, A. (2008). Neural activity of the anterior insula in emotional processing depends on the individuals' emotional susceptibility. Human brain mapping, 29(3), 363-373.
- Shulman, E. P., Smith, A. R., Silva, K., Icenogle, G., Duell, N., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2016). The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation. Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 17, 103-11
- Tackett, J. L. (2006). Evaluating models of the personality–psychopathology relationship in children and adolescents. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(5), 584-599.
Frequency
Attendance is stronlgy recommended.
Exam mode
Exam modalities for attending students:
The exam for attending students consists of five different midterm assessments related to the lectures and two midterm assessments for the laboratory.
Lectures (Theoretical Part):
First midterm assessment: 7 multiple-choice questions (0–7 points)
Second midterm assessment: Group presentations of a scientific article in English (0–4 points) – DURING THE COURSE
Third midterm assessment: Each group, in rotation, will take the role of a review committee and provide critical feedback on another group’s article presentation (0–2 points) – DURING THE COURSE
Fourth midterm assessment: Two questions following each group presentation (0–3 points) – AT THE END OF EACH GROUP PRESENTATION
Fifth midterm assessment: 7 multiple-choice questions (0–7 points)
Laboratory:
First written midterm assessment: One open-ended question involving the analysis of a personality/temperament profile (0–4 points)
Final midterm assessment: One open-ended question involving the analysis of a profile related to individual and behavioral characteristics covered in the course (0–4 points)
For Non-Attending Students:
Lectures:
23 multiple-choice questions
See the e-learning platform for exam topics
Laboratory:
Two open-ended questions (0–4 points each)
See the e-learning platform for exam topics
Bibliography
Una selezioni di articoli disponibili su e-learning:
- Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. An-nu. Rev. Psychol., 57, 401-421.
- Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in persona-lity traits across the life course: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological bulletin, 132(1), 1.
- Caspi, A., Roberts, B.W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 56, 453-484.
- Vecchione, M., Alessandri, G., Barbaranelli, C., & Caprara, G. (2012). Gender differences in the Big Five personality development: A longitudinal investigation from late adolescence to emerging adul-thood. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(6), 740-746.
- Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Eggum, N. D. (2010). Emotion-related self-regulation and its rela-tion to children's maladjustment. Annual review of clinical psychology, 6, 495-525.
- Rothbart, M. K., & Bates, J. E. (2006). Temperament. In W. Damon (Editor-in-Chief ) & N. Eisen-berg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, personality deve-lopment(pp. 99–166). New York: Wiley.
- Evans, D. E., & Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Developing a model for adult temperament. Journal of Re-search in Personality, 41(4), 868- 888.
- Thartori, E., Zuffianò, A., Pastorelli, C., Di Giunta, L., Lunetti, C., Lansford, J. E., ... & Caprara, G. V. (2018). The interactive effects of maternal personality and adolescent temperament on externali-zing behavior problem trajectories from age 12 to 14. Personality and Individual Differences, 134, 301-307.
- Caprara, G. V., Fida, R., Vecchione, M., Del Bove, G., Vecchio, G. M., Barbaranelli, C., & Bandu-ra, A. (2008). Longitudinal analysis of the role of perceived self-efficacy for self-regulated learning in academic continuance and achievement. Journal of educational psychology, 100(3), 525
- Di Giunta, L., Iselin, A.-M. R., Lansford, J. E., Eisenberg, N., Lunetti, C., Thartori, E., Basili, E., Pastorel-li, C., Bacchini, D., Uribe Tirado, L. M., & Gerbino, M. (2018). Parents' and early adolescents’ self-efficacy about anger regulation and early adolescents’ internalizing and externalizing problems: A longitu-dinal study in three countries. Journal of Adolescence.
- Duell, N., Steinberg, L., Chein, J., Al-Hassan, S. M., Bacchini, D., Lei, C., ... & Lansford, J. E. (2016). Interaction of reward seeking and self-regulation in the prediction of risk taking: A cross-national test of the dual systems model. Developmental psychology, 52(10), 1593
- Iaria, G., Committeri, G., Pastorelli, C., Pizzamiglio, L., Watkins, K. E., & Carota, A. (2008). Neural activity of the anterior insula in emotional processing depends on the individuals' emotional susceptibility. Human brain mapping, 29(3), 363-373.
- Shulman, E. P., Smith, A. R., Silva, K., Icenogle, G., Duell, N., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2016). The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation. Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 17, 103-11
- Tackett, J. L. (2006). Evaluating models of the personality–psychopathology relationship in children and adolescents. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(5), 584-599.
Lesson mode
Teaching methods
The course topics will be presented through frontal lessons and practical activities (group presentation, flipped classes, in-class assignments, laboratory activities). Frontal lessons aim to promote students’ knowledge and comprehension of theoretical models and methods associated with the study of individual differences in personality and temperament across the life-span, and to promote students’ skills in criti-cally evaluating alternative prevention and promotion interventions, being able to recognize correspond-ing advantages and disadvantages. Group activities and in-class assignments aim: 1) to develop the capac-ity to read and interpret scientific questionnaires to evaluate temperament and personality; 2) to acquire the capacity to plan and implement evidence-based intervention programs, through practical activities in which students must produce project proposals. Group activities promote active participation of all stu-dents in the learning process through multiple specific activities aimed at facilitating the acquisition of the skills related to the learning goals of this course.
The laboratory activities aim to: 1) develop the critical capacity in the choice of the tools to be adminis-tered for the evaluation of the personality in the different contexts of health, labor and legal law, knowing the ad-vantages and disadvantages of using these tools in the process assessment; 2) acquire, through the study of the individual case, the ability to read and interpret the personality profile by integrating the in-formation deriving from the various evaluation tools adopted, to advance more accurate hypotheses re-gard-ing the functioning of the person in his context; 3) develop the ability to effectively process the re-turn of an evaluation at the end of an assessment process.
All information about this course will be reported on the corresponding site on e-learning.
https://elearning2.uniroma1.it/login/index.php
INSTRUCTIONS FOR GROUP PRESENTATIONS
GOAL: To ensure the active participation of each student in the learning process, through participating in small group activities (minimum two students).
PREMISES: Groups should be established on the first day of class and will remain until the semester's end. Each group member will be responsible for supporting the group's goal. HOW?
1) Presentation of a scientific article. Every week, one group of students will have to present to the other students a summary of a scientific paper, which will be aligned with the topic discussed every week in class. Each group has to guarantee:
- The presentation relies on the article's content and presents the theoretical background.
- The active participation of all their peers.
- The presentation should be creative. Each group will have the support of Dr. Di Giunta or one of her in-terns. The review will always be during one of the days of class.
The group presentation will have to last 45 minutes.
2) Interaction with the group of the Review Committee. Every week, one group of students will have to interact with the group that presented a summary of a scientific article.
Each week, the review committee must be inspired by an existing institution that works internationally in funding research projects (e.g., the National Institute of Health).
The Review Committee should also present a few slides to show the institution they “belong to shortly.
The work of the review committee will have to last 15 minutes.
3) After the group presentation, the students must answer two open-ended questions about the scien-tific article the group summarized.